Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding people's decisions when choosing or declining a kidney transplant: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Jones, Emma Louise; Shakespeare, Kate; McLaughlin, Leah; Noyes, Jane.
Afiliação
  • Jones EL; School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Shakespeare K; Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Clinical Psychology Dept, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Rhyl, UK.
  • McLaughlin L; School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
  • Noyes J; School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK jane.noyes@bangor.ac.uk.
BMJ Open ; 13(8): e071348, 2023 08 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37562929
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To synthesise qualitative research exploring patients' perspectives, experiences and factors influencing their decision-making preferences when choosing or declining kidney transplantation.

DESIGN:

A qualitative evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched from 2000 to June 2021 PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Core Databases for Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Qualitative studies exploring and reporting decision-making preferences of people with kidney disease, which reported influencing factors when choosing or declining kidney transplantation, published in English from high-income and middle-income countries. DATA EXTRACTION AND

SYNTHESIS:

Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis was done with the use of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist to assess study quality, and assessment of confidence in the qualitative findings was done using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research.

FINDINGS:

37 studies from 11 countries reported the perspectives of 1366 patients with kidney disease. Six descriptive themes were developed decisional preferences influenced patients' readiness to pursue kidney transplantation, gathering sufficient information to support decision-making, navigating the kidney transplant assessment pathway, desire for kidney transplantation, opposed to kidney transplantation and uncertainties while waiting for the kidney transplant. A new enhanced theoretical model was developed to aid understanding of the complexities of decision-making in people with kidney disease, by integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Adaptive Decision Maker Framework to incorporate the novel findings.

CONCLUSION:

The synthesis provides a better understanding of the extremely complex decision-making processes of people with kidney disease, which are aligned to their kidney transplantation preferences. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for declining kidney transplantation, and to underpin development of personalised information, interventions and support for patients to make informed decisions when presented with kidney replacement options. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021272588.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Fomentar_producao_conhecimento_especifico Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Policy_brief / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Fomentar_producao_conhecimento_especifico Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Policy_brief / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article