Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Further psychometric validation and test-retest reproducibility of the WOUND-Q.
Simonsen, Nina Vestergaard; Klassen, Anne F; Rae, Charlene; Dalaei, Farima; Cano, Stefan; Poulsen, Lotte; Pusic, Andrea L; Sørensen, Jens Ahm.
Afiliação
  • Simonsen NV; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Klassen AF; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Rae C; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Dalaei F; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Cano S; Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, UK.
  • Poulsen L; Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Løntoft, Nyhøj and Poulsen Plastic Surgery, Odense, Denmark.
  • Pusic AL; Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value & Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sørensen JA; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14354, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37581232
WOUND-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure developed for all types of chronic wounds, located anywhere on the body. To establish reliability and validity of a patient-reported outcome measure, multiple pieces of evidence are required. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of 9 of the 13 WOUND-Q scales and perform a test-retest reproducibility study in an international sample. In August 2022, we invited members of an international online community (Prolific.com) with any type of chronic wound to complete a survey containing the WOUND-Q scales, the Wound-QoL and EQ-5D. A test-retest survey was performed 7 days after the first survey. It was possible to examine the reliability and validity of eight of the nine WOUND-Q scales by Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT). To examine test-retest reproducibility intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the standard error of the measurement and the smallest detectable change were calculated. In total, 421 patients from 22 different countries with 11 different types of chronic wounds took part in this study. Our analyses provided further evidence of the reliability and validity of the scales measuring wound characteristics (assessment, drainage, smell), health-related quality of life (life impact, psychological, sleep, social) and wound treatment (dressing).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Wound J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Wound J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article