Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally Invasive and Innovative Management of Prosthesis Infections in Endoscopic-Assisted Breast Reconstruction.
Xie, Yanyan; Hu, Xiaoxia; Du, Zhenggui; Liang, Faqing; Lv, Qing; Li, Bo.
Afiliação
  • Xie Y; Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Hu X; Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Du Z; Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Liang F; Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Lv Q; Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Li B; Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(3): 266-272, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37605028
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Implant infection continues to be the most common complication of breast reconstruction, and it can lead to serious consequences of implant loss. Recently, endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction is being performed more frequently, with similar prosthetic infection incidence compared to conventional techniques. But there is little information published in the literature on the management of periprosthetic infection in endoscopic-assisted breast reconstruction.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent endoscope-assisted breast reconstruction and developed periprosthetic infection between January 2020 and December 2022. Prosthesis infection was defined as any case where antibiotics were given, beyond the surgeon's standard perioperative period, in response to clinical signs such as swelling, pain, erythema, increased temperature, fever, etc. We summarized our clinical approach and treatment protocol for periprosthetic infection patients. Collected data include preoperative basic information, surgical details, postoperative data, and outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 580 patients (713 reconstructions) underwent endoscopic-assisted immediate breast reconstruction. There were 58 patients developed periprosthetic infection, 14 of whom had bilateral prosthesis reconstruction with unilateral prosthesis infection. The incidence of infection was 10.0%. Average follow-up was 17.3 ± 8.9 months (range = 2-37 months). Of the 58 patients, 53 (91.4%) patients successful salvaged implant and 5(8.6%) patients removed prosthesis. During follow-up, Baker III capsular contracture occurred in 2 patients (3.8%) who had radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION:

Our management of prosthesis infections in endoscopic-assisted breast reconstruction is easy, minimally invasive, and inexpensive. This method can be repeated if the implant infection does not improve after the first drainage. What's more, our data suggest that our prosthesis salvage of periprosthetic infection is effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Subcutânea / Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Subcutânea / Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article