Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of life after wearing multifocal contact lenses for myopia control for 2 weeks in the BLINK Study.
Ticak, Anita; Walline, Jeffrey J; Berntsen, David A; Mutti, Donald O; Jones-Jordan, Lisa A; Cardenas, Laura; Day, Elizabeth; Dougherty, Bradley E.
Afiliação
  • Ticak A; University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Walline JJ; The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Berntsen DA; University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Mutti DO; The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Jones-Jordan LA; The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Cardenas L; University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Day E; The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Dougherty BE; The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 43(6): 1491-1499, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37609711
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To validate Pediatric Refractive Error Profile 2 (PREP2) subscales that can be used to evaluate contact lens wearers and compare vision-specific quality of life measurements between children wearing multifocal and single vision contact lenses for 2 weeks.

METHODS:

Two hundred and ninety-four myopic children aged 7-11 years (inclusive) were enrolled in the 3-year, double-masked Bifocal Lenses In Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study. Participants completed the PREP2 survey after having worn contact lenses for 2 weeks. The Vision, Symptoms, Activities and Overall PREP2 subscales were used to compare participants' subjective assessment while wearing +1.50 or +2.50 D add multifocal or single vision contact lenses. Rasch analysis was used to validate each subscale and to compare participants' subjective assessment of contact lens wear.

RESULTS:

Item fit to the Rasch model was good for all scales, with no individual items having infit mean square statistics outside the recommended range (0.7-1.3). Response category function was acceptable for all subscales, with ordered category thresholds. Measurement precision, assessed by the Rasch person reliability statistic, was less than ideal (≥0.8) for three of the subscales, but met the minimum acceptable standard of 0.5. Scores for the Vision subscale differed by treatment assignment (p = 0.03), indicating that participants with the highest add power reported statistically worse quality of vision, although the difference was only 3.9 units on a scale of 1-100. Girls reported fewer symptoms than boys (p = 0.006), but there were no other differences between boys and girls.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rasch analysis demonstrates that the PREP2 survey is a valid instrument for assessing refractive error-specific quality of life. These results suggest that vision-related quality of life is not meaningfully affected by 2 weeks of soft multifocal contact lens wear for myopia control.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article