Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Skeletal Anchorage Augmentation in Extraction/Nonextraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Study.
Shah, Niti Dharmendra; Goje, Santosh Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Shah ND; KM Shah Dental College & Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, Phone: +91 9978601796, e-mail: nitinol1305@gmail.com.
  • Goje SK; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, KM Shah Dental College & Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 24(7): 424-436, 2023 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37622618
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate and compare skeletal, dental, and soft tissue parameters by therapeutic extraction of first premolar and nonextraction distalization of maxillary and mandibular arches in bimaxillary proclination using the skeletal anchorage system. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

About 40 orthodontic patients undergoing extraction or nonextraction treatment are enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Participants are randomly assigned to either the extraction or nonextraction group and receive treatment augmented with skeletal anchorage. Mini implants were placed in the extraction group for retraction and infra-zygomatic crest (IZC) and buccal shelf screws were placed in the nonextraction group for distalization. OBSERVATIONS AND

RESULTS:

Comparison between the ages of the patients among both Groups showed no significant difference. A significant difference is observed in dental and soft tissue parameters before and after the treatment in group A, whereas skeletal parameters also showed significant changes along with dental and soft tissue parameters in group B.

CONCLUSION:

There is a significant change in the position of incisors by retraction and facial profile improves gradually in group A while for group B, a marked change in lower facial height was even seen. On comparing both the groups, a highly significant difference can be seen with respect to the amount of incisor retraction and change in molar inclination. The time taken for retraction of incisors is less in comparison to distalization. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

With this, we can easily avoid premolar extraction, and in cases of impacted third molars distalization as when indicated can be helpful as a part of the nonextraction treatment plan.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Odontológica / Má Oclusão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Odontológica / Má Oclusão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article