Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of an addiction recovery patient-reported outcome measure: Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR).
Okrant, Elisabeth; Reif, Sharon; Horgan, Constance M.
Afiliação
  • Okrant E; Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
  • Reif S; Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. reif@brandeis.edu.
  • Horgan CM; Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 18(1): 52, 2023 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658373
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recovery, a primary goal of addiction treatment, goes beyond abstinence. Incorporating broad domains with key elements that vary across individuals, recovery is a difficult concept to measure. Most addiction-related quality measurement has emphasized process measures, which limits evaluation of treatment quality and long-term outcomes, whereas patient-reported outcomes are richer and nuanced. To address these gaps, this study developed and tested a patient-reported outcome measure for addiction recovery, named Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR).

METHODS:

A multi-stage mixed methods approach followed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure development standard. People with lived experience (PWLE) of addiction, treatment providers, and other experts contributed to item distillation and iterative measure refinement. From an item bank of 356 unique items, 57 items were tested via survey and interviews, followed by focus groups and cognitive interviews.

RESULTS:

Face validity was demonstrated throughout. PWLE rated item importance higher and with greater variance than providers, yet both agreed that "There are more important things to me in my life than using substances" was the most important item. The final R2AR instrument has 19 items across 8 recovery domains, spanning early, active, and long-term recovery phases. Respondents assess agreement for each item as (1) a strength, and (2) importance to ongoing recovery.

CONCLUSION:

R2AR allows PWLE to define what is important to their recovery. It is designed to support treatment planning as part of clinical workflows and to track recovery progress. Inclusion of PWLE and providers in the development process enhances its face validity. Including PWLE in the development of R2AR and using the tool to guide recovery planning emphasizes the importance of patient-centeredness in designing clinical tools and involving patients in their own care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Aditivo Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Aditivo Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article