Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective validation of a risk score to predict pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Black, George B; Kim, Joshua H; Vitter, Sophie; Ibrahim, Rand; Lisko, John C; Perdoncin, Emily; Shekiladze, Nikoloz; Gleason, Patrick T; Grubb, Kendra J; Greenbaum, Adam B; Devireddy, Chandan M; Guyton, Robert A; Leshnower, Bradley; Merchant, Faisal M; El-Chami, Mikhael; Westerman, Stacy B; Shah, Anand D; Leon, Angel R; Lloyd, Michael S; Babaliaros, Vasilis C; Kiani, Soroosh.
Afiliação
  • Black GB; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Kim JH; Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Vitter S; Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Ibrahim R; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Lisko JC; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Perdoncin E; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Shekiladze N; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Gleason PT; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Grubb KJ; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Greenbaum AB; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Devireddy CM; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Guyton RA; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Leshnower B; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Merchant FM; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • El-Chami M; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Westerman SB; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Shah AD; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Leon AR; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Lloyd MS; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Babaliaros VC; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Kiani S; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(11): 2225-2232, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37702135
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The need for pacemaker is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We previously described the Emory Risk Score (ERS) to predict the need for new pacemaker implant (PPM) after TAVR. Metrics included in the score are a history of syncope, pre-existing RBBB, QRS duration ≥140 ms, and prosthesis oversizing ≥16%. To prospectively validate the previously described risk score.

METHODS:

We prospectively evaluated all patients without pre-existing pacemakers, ICD, or pre-existing indications for pacing undergoing TAVR with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 prosthesis at our institution from March 2019 to December 2020 (n = 661). Patients were scored prospectively; however, results were blinded from clinical decision-making. The primary endpoint was PPM at 30 days after TAVR. Performance of the ERS was evaluated using logistic regression, a calibration curve to prior performance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 48 patients (7.3%) had PPM after TAVR. A higher ERS predicted an increased likelihood of PPM (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.05-3.25 per point, p < 0.001). There was good correlation between observed and expected values on the calibration curve (slope = 1.04, calibration at large = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.81 (95% CI [0.74-0.88], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The ERS prospectively predicted the need for PPM in a serial, real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVR with a balloon-expandable prosthesis, confirming findings previously described in retrospective cohorts. Notably, the prospective performance of the score was comparable with that of the initial cohorts. The risk score could serve as a framework for preprocedural risk stratification for PPM after TAVR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Marca-Passo Artificial / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Marca-Passo Artificial / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article