Language Differences by Race on Letters of Recommendation for the Pediatric Surgery Match.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate if there is any significant linguistic difference in LoR based on applicant's race/ethnicity. DESIGN: Retrospective review of applications to pediatric surgery fellowship at a single institution (2016-2020). Race was self-reported by applicants. LoR were analyzed via the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software program. SETTING: Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida USA. A free-standing tertiary pediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants from 2016 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1086 LoR from 280 applicants (52% female) were analyzed. Racial distribution was Caucasians 62.1%, Asian 12.1%, Hispanics 7.1%, multiracial 6.4% African Americans 5%, and other/unknown 7.1%. Letter writers were largely male (84%), pediatric surgeons (63%) and professors (57%). There was no difference in LoR word count across races. LoR for female multiracial candidates contained higher use of affiliation and negative emotion terms compared to Hispanic females (p = 0.002 and 0.048, respectively), and past focus terms when compared to Caucasian and Asian female applicants (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Religion terms were more common in LoR for Asian females when compared to Caucasian females (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates linguistic differences in LoR for pediatric surgery training programs based on applicant race/ethnicity. While differences are present, these do not suggest overt bias based on applicants race or ethnicity.