Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Respiratory Telerehabilitation in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Calvache-Mateo, Andrés; Heredia-Ciuró, Alejandro; Martín-Núñez, Javier; Hernández-Hernández, Sofía; Reychler, Gregory; López-López, Laura; Valenza, Marie Carmen.
Afiliação
  • Calvache-Mateo A; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.
  • Heredia-Ciuró A; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.
  • Martín-Núñez J; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.
  • Hernández-Hernández S; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.
  • Reychler G; Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
  • López-López L; Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
  • Valenza MC; Service de Pneumologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(18)2023 Sep 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37761716
ABSTRACT
The aim of this review was to identify, map, and synthesize the extent and nature of research activity on the use of telerehabilitation to support Long COVID-19 rehabilitation and examine the efficacy and safety of respiratory telerehabilitation in patients with Long COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed. We included controlled trials that tested the effect of respiratory telerehabilitation interventions in patients with Long COVID-19 versus no intervention, usual care, placebo, or face-to-face intervention. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for quality of life, dyspnea, lung function, anxiety and depression, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and lower limb strength. Finally, 10 studies were included. The meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory telerehabilitation in quality of life (p = 0.02), dyspnea (p < 0.00001), respiratory muscle strength (p < 0.001), functional capacity (p < 0.0001), and lower limb strength (p = 0.01) but not in lung function (p = 0.28) and anxiety and depression (p = 0.55). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse effects (p = 0.06) between the telerehabilitation and comparator groups. The results suggest that these interventions can improve quality of life, reduce dyspnea, and increase respiratory and lower extremity muscle strength as well as functional capacity in patients with Long COVID-19.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article