Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer: a real-life study.
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel; Alonso-Lárraga, Juan Octavio; Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica I; Lino-Silva, Leonardo Saul; Olivas-Martinez, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Jiménez-Gutiérrez JM; Department of Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, México.
  • Alonso-Lárraga JO; Department of Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Hernández-Guerrero AI; Department of Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Lino-Silva LS; Department of Surgical Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Olivas-Martinez A; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc ; 16: 26317745231200975, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771789
ABSTRACT

Background:

Dysphagia is the most frequent symptom in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the current palliative treatment of choice for dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of different types of SEMS for palliation of dysphagia.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer and SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation in a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was the clinical success defined as an improvement in dysphagia (reduction of at least 2 points in the Mellow-Pinkas scoring system for dysphagia) after SEMS placement.

Results:

Between January 1999 and May 2020, 295 patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Among them, 75 had a SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 years (standard deviation 13.4), 69 patients (92%) were men, and the mean Mellow-Pinkas scoring for dysphagia pre- and post-SEMS placement were 3.1 and 1.4 (change from baseline -1.7), respectively. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 98.6% and 58.9%, respectively. AEs were identified in 35/75 patients (46.7%), and SEMS migration was the most frequent AE in 22/75 patients (29.3%). There were no significant differences in improvement in dysphagia (p = 0.054), weight changes (p = 0.78), and AE (p = 0.73) among fully covered SEMS (fc-SEMS) and partially covered SEMS (pc-SEMS). The median follow-up was 89 days (interquartile range 29-221).

Conclusion:

SEMS placement was associated with a rapid improvement in dysphagia, high technical success, and a modest improvement in dysphagia with no major AE among fc-SEMS and pc-SEMS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article