Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data.
Reed, Kristine G; Sun, Zhaojun; Yabes, Jonathan G; Drake, Coleman; Ober, Nicole; Jacobs, Bruce; van Londen, G J; Bradley, Cathy J; Sabik, Lindsay M.
Afiliação
  • Reed KG; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Sun Z; Shenandoah Oncology, Winchester, VA, USA.
  • Yabes JG; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Drake C; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Ober N; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Jacobs B; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • van Londen GJ; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Bradley CJ; Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Sabik LM; Shenandoah Oncology, Winchester, VA, USA.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 7(6)2023 Oct 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788093
Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation certifies facilities provide quality care. We assessed differences among patients who do and do not visit CoC facilities using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data linked to facility records for patients diagnosed with cancer between 2018 and 2019 (n = 87 472). Predicted probabilities from multivariable logistic regression indicated patients in the most advantaged Area Deprivation Index quartiles were more likely to visit CoC facilities (78.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.5% to 78.6%) compared with other quartiles. Urban patients (74.1%, 95% CI = 73.8% to 74.4%) were more likely than rural to be seen at a CoC facility (62.7%, 95% CI = 61.2% to 64.2%) as were Hispanic patients (88.0%, 95% CI = 86.7% to 89.3%) and non-Hispanic Black patients (79.1%, 95% CI = 78.1% to 80.0%) compared with White patients (72.0%, 95% CI = 71.7% to 72.4%). Differences in demographics suggest CoC data may underrepresent some groups, including low-income and rural patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JNCI Cancer Spectr Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JNCI Cancer Spectr Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article