Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concurrent Validity of The Expanded Cutting Alignment Scoring Tool (E-CAST).
Butler, Lauren; Martinez, Alexa; Erdman, Ashley; Sugimoto, Dai; Loewen, Alex; Milian, Eryn; Wyatt, Charles; Hayden, Kristin; DeVerna, Amie; Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten; Ulman, Sophia.
Afiliação
  • Butler L; Physical Therapy Florida International University.
  • Martinez A; Rehabilitation, Nicklaus Children's Hospital.
  • Erdman A; Rehabilitation, Nicklaus Children's Hospital.
  • Sugimoto D; Scottish Rite for Children.
  • Loewen A; Waseda University.
  • Milian E; The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention.
  • Wyatt C; Scottish Rite for Children.
  • Hayden K; University of Miami.
  • DeVerna A; Scottish Rite for Children.
  • Tulchin-Francis K; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
  • Ulman S; Rehabilitation, Nicklaus Children's Hospital.
Int J Sports Phys Ther ; 18(5): 1147-1155, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37795331
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Expanded Cutting Alignment Scoring Tool (E-CAST) has been previously shown to be reliable when assessing lower extremity alignment during a 45-degree sidestep cut, however, the validity of this tool remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the E-CAST by comparing visually identified movement errors from two-dimensional (2D) video with three-dimensional (3D) biomechanical variables collected using motion capture. Study

Design:

Cross Sectional.

Methods:

Sixty female athletes (age 14.1 ± 1.5 years) who regularly participated in cutting/pivoting sports performed a sidestep cut with 2D video and 3D motion capture simultaneously recording. One clinician scored the 2D videos for each limb using the E-CAST criteria. Joint angles and moments captured in 3D were computed for the trunk and knee. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the accuracy of each E-CAST item and to provide cut-off points for risk factor identification.

Results:

ROC analyses identified a cut-off point for all biomechanical variables with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 70-85% and 55-89%, respectively. Across items, the area under the curve ranged from 0.67 to 0.91.

Conclusion:

The E-CAST performed with acceptable to outstanding area under the curve values for all variables except static knee valgus. Level of evidence 3b.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Sports Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Sports Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article