Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study.
Chao, Wei-Hsiang; Cheng, Wen-Shan; Hu, Li-Ming; Liao, Chia-Chih.
Afiliação
  • Chao WH; Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
  • Cheng WS; Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
  • Hu LM; Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
  • Liao CC; Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan. m7147@cgmh.org.tw.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 338, 2023 10 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37803290
BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia (EA) is the regional anesthesia technique preferred over spinal anesthesia for pregnant women requiring cesarean section and post-operative pain control. EA failure requires additional sedation or conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This may be hazardous during sedation or GA conversion because of potentially difficult airways. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to determine the risk factors for epidural failure during cesarean section anesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed parturients who underwent cesarean section under EA and catheterization at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patient data were collected from the medical records. EA failure was defined as the administration of any intravenous anesthetic at any time during a cesarean section, converting it into GA. RESULTS: A total of 534 parturients who underwent cesarean section were recruited for this study. Of them, 94 (17.6%) experienced EA failure during cesarean section. Compared to the patients with successful EA, those with EA failure were younger (33.0 years vs. 34.7 years), had received EA previously (60.6% vs. 37%), were parous (72.3% vs. 55%), and had a shorter waiting time (14.9 min vs. 16.5 min) (p < 0.05). Younger age (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95), history of epidural analgesia (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.38-4.94), and shorter waiting time (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.97) were estimated to be significantly associated with a higher risk of epidural anesthesia failure. CONCLUSION: The retrospective study found that parturients of younger age, previous epidural catheterization history, and inadequate waiting time may have a higher risk of EA failure. Previous epidural catheterization increased the risk of EA failure by 2.6-fold compared to patient with no history of catheterization.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Analgesia Epidural / Anestesia por Condução / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica / Raquianestesia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Analgesia Epidural / Anestesia por Condução / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica / Raquianestesia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article