Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of acute cholecystitis in patients on anti-thrombotic therapy: A single center experience.
Feuerwerker, Solomon; Kambli, Ruja; Grinberg, Diana; Malhotra, Ajai; An, Gary.
Afiliação
  • Feuerwerker S; Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
  • Kambli R; Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
  • Grinberg D; Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
  • Malhotra A; Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
  • An G; Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
Surg Open Sci ; 16: 94-97, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37808421
Background: Acute cholecystitis in patients on anti-thrombotic therapy (ATT) presents a clinical dilemma at the intersection between conflicting guidelines, specifically between timing of early operative management (OM) versus time-to-reversal of certain ATT agents. With growing recognition that nonoperative management (NOM) is associated with considerable morbidity, and evidence in the literature that early OM in patients on ATT is safe, we reviewed our own practice to examine how we addressed these conflicting guidelines. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with acute cholecystitis between December 2017 and March 2022. Patients were classified as ATT or non-ATT; ATT patients were subdivided into anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) groups. Rates of OM were compared. Results: 502 patients with acute cholecystitis were identified, 464 non-ATT and 38 ATT. 30 ATT patients were on AC, 7 on AP, and 1 on both. Non-ATT patients were significantly more likely to receive OM at index presentation compared to those on ATT: 89.9 % vs 63.2 % (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of the ATT group showed AP patients were significantly less likely to receive OM compared to those on AC, 12.5 % vs 77 % (p < 0.05). Conclusions: At our institution, patients on ATT were significantly less likely to undergo OM for acute cholecystitis compared with non-ATT patients. Those on AC received OM significantly more than patients on AP. Further study is needed to better define the management of this growing population so that acute cholecystitis guidelines might address this issue in the future.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Surg Open Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Surg Open Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article