Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Imaging of the pelvic floor (MR defecography) : The surgeon's perspective]. / Bildgebung des Beckenbodens (MR-Defäkographie) : Die Sicht der Chirurgie.
Dohmen, Jonas; Pieper, Claus C; Kalff, Jörg C; Vilz, Tim.
Afiliação
  • Dohmen J; Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein­, Viszeral­, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. jonas.dohmen@ukbonn.de.
  • Pieper CC; Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
  • Kalff JC; Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein­, Viszeral­, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
  • Vilz T; Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein­, Viszeral­, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Radiologie (Heidelb) ; 63(11): 827-834, 2023 Nov.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831101
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) plays a central role in diagnosing pelvic floor functional disorders by visualizing the entire pelvic floor along with pelvic organs and providing functional assessment of the defecation process. A shared understanding between radiology and surgery regarding indications and interpretation of findings is crucial for optimal utilization of MRD.

OBJECTIVES:

This review aims to explain the indications for MRD from a surgical perspective and elucidate the significance of radiological findings for treatment. It intends to clarify for which symptoms MRD is appropriate and which criteria should be followed for standardized results. This is prerequisite to develop interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including current consensus guidelines.

RESULTS:

MRD can provide relevant findings in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation syndrome, particularly in cases of pelvic floor descent, enterocele, intussusception, and pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, rectocele findings in MRD should be interpreted with caution in order to avoid overdiagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

MRD findings should never be considered in isolation but rather in conjunction with patient history, clinical examination, and symptomatology since morphology and functional complaints may not always correlate, and there is wide variance of normal values. Interdisciplinary interpretation of MRD results involving radiology, surgery, gynecology, and urology, preferably in the context of pelvic floor conferences, is recommended.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico / Cirurgiões Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: De Revista: Radiologie (Heidelb) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico / Cirurgiões Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: De Revista: Radiologie (Heidelb) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article