Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of topical anesthetic and fluorescein on non-contact tonometry measurements using ultra-high-speed dynamic Scheimpflug.
Macedo, Marcelo; Hatanaka, Marcelo; Barboza, Wilma Lelis; Mingione, Gabriella Marranghello; Ambrósio, Renato; Susanna, Remo.
Afiliação
  • Macedo M; Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. macedoeye@gmail.com.
  • Hatanaka M; Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Barboza WL; Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mingione GM; Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ambrósio R; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Susanna R; Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 17864, 2023 10 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857798
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the effects of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops on intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and biomechanical properties as measured by Corvis ST (CST-Oculus; Wezlar, Germany) in healthy eyes. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 46 healthy patients. The CST measurements were obtained before and immediately after the instillation of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops. Pre-post instillation data were statistically analyzed. IOP measurements were compared to Goldmann's Applanation Tonometry (GAT), which was also performed after drops instillation. Biomechanical parameters analyzed included applanation 1 velocity, applanation 2 velocity, applanation 1 time, applanation 2 time, whole eye movement, deflection amplitude, and stiffness parameter at first applanation. A statistically significant difference in IOP, both for non-corrected IOP (IOPnct) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP), was observed before and after the instillation of eyedrops. Despite this statistical significance, the observed difference lacked clinical relevance. The IOPnct demonstrated a significant difference pre and post-anesthetic and fluorescein instillation compared to GAT (14.99 ± 2.27 mmHg pre-instillation and 14.62 ± 2.50 mmHg post-instillation, versus 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0014 and 0.0490, respectively). Comparable findings were noted when justaposing bIOP to GAT (14.53 ± 2.10 mmHg pre-instillation and 13.15 ± 2.25 mmHg post-instillation, against 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0391 and 0.0022, respectively). Additionally, CCT measurements revealed a statistically significant elevation following the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops (from 544.64 ± 39.85 µm to 586.74 ± 41.71 µm, p < 0.01. None of the analyzed biomechanical parameters showed statistically significant differences after drops instillation. While the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops induced a statistically significant alteration in both IOPnct and bIOP readings, these changes were not clinically consequential. Furthermore, a notable statistical rise was observed in CCT measurements post-drops instillation, as determined by CST. Yet, corneal biomechanical parameters remained unaffected.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tonometria Ocular / Anestésicos Locais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tonometria Ocular / Anestésicos Locais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article