Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cell-Free DNA Methylation Analysis as a Marker of Malignancy in Pleural Fluid.
Bixby, Billie; Vrba, Lukas; Lenka, Jyoti; Oshiro, Marc; Watts, George S; Hughes, Trina; Erickson, Heidi; Chopra, Madhav; Knepler, James L; Knox, Kenneth S; Jarnagin, Lisa; Alalawi, Raed; Kala, Mrinalini; Bernert, Richard; Routh, Joshua; Roe, Denise J; Garland, Linda L; Futscher, Bernard W; Nelson, Mark A.
Afiliação
  • Bixby B; University of Arizona.
  • Vrba L; University of Arizona.
  • Lenka J; University of Arizona.
  • Oshiro M; University of Arizona.
  • Watts GS; University of Arizona.
  • Hughes T; University of Arizona.
  • Erickson H; University of Arizona.
  • Chopra M; University of Arizona.
  • Knepler JL; University of Arizona.
  • Knox KS; University of Arizona.
  • Jarnagin L; University of Arizona.
  • Alalawi R; University of Arizona.
  • Kala M; University of Arizona.
  • Roe DJ; University of Arizona.
  • Garland LL; University of Arizona.
  • Futscher BW; University of Arizona.
  • Nelson MA; University of Arizona.
Res Sq ; 2023 Oct 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886511
Background: Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is made by cytological examination of pleural fluid or histological examination of pleural tissue from biopsy. Unfortunately, detection of malignancy using cytology has an overall sensitivity of 50%, and is dependent upon tumor load, volume of fluid assessed, and cytopathologist experience. The diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology is also compromised by low abundance of tumor cells or when morphology is obscured by inflammation or reactive mesothelial cells. A reliable molecular marker that may complement fluid cytology malignant pleural effusion diagnosis is needed. The purpose of this study was to establish a molecular diagnostic approach based on pleural effusion cell-free DNA methylation analysis for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion and benign pleural effusion. Results: This was a blind, prospective case-control biomarker study. We recruited 104 patients with pleural effusion for the study. We collected pleural fluid from patients with: MPE (n = 48), PPE (n = 28), and benign PE (n = 28), and performed the Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy assay. The methylation level of Sentinel-MPE was markedly higher in the MPE samples compared to BPE control samples (p < 0.0001) and the same tendency was observed relative to PPE (p = 0.004). We also noted that the methylation signal was significantly higher in PPE relative to BPE (p < 0.001). We also assessed the diagnostic efficiency of the Sentinel-MPE test by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). For the ROC analysis we combined the malignant and paramalignant groups (n = 76) and compared against the benign group (n = 28). The detection sensitivity and specificity of the Sentinel-MPE test was high (AUC = 0.912). The Sentinel-MPE appears to have better performance characteristics than cytology analysis. However, combining Sentinel-MPE with cytology analysis could be an even more effective approach for the diagnosis of MPE. Conclusions: The Sentinel-MPE test can discriminate between BPE and MPE. The Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy test can detect aberrant DNA in several different tumor types. The Sentinel-MPE test can be a complementary tool to cytology in the diagnosis of MPE.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Sq Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Sq Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article