Transradial versus transfemoral approach in cerebral angiography: A meta-analysis.
Interv Neuroradiol
; : 15910199231212520, 2023 Nov 07.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37936392
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Cerebral angiography has two common access sites Transradial approach and transfemoral approach. However, there's no definitive answer to which one is superior.OBJECTIVE:
Compare transradial approach and transfemoral approach for a cerebral angiography procedure.METHODS:
A systematic review of the literature of studies reporting both transradial approach and transfemoral approach results was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were queried.RESULTS:
The meta-analysis examined 18 studies comprising 9388 patients undergoing cerebral angiography. Among the patients, 4598 underwent transradial approach (48.9%) and 4790 underwent transfemoral approach (51.1%). Our results revealed no statistical differences between the approaches regarding procedure success, crossover to transfemoral approach, procedure and fluoroscopy time between both approaches in cerebral angiography. Total, major, and minor complications comparisons were more favorable to transradial approach for this procedure.CONCLUSION:
These findings suggest, despite the ultimate decision regarding the choice of access method might be influenced by the physician's experience and personal preference, the data distinctly lean toward transradial approach as the preferable option for cerebral angiography. The advantages of transradial approach, highlighted by its lower complication rates, especially major complications, suggest that its adoption could contribute to enhanced patient safety and procedural outcomes.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Systematic_reviews
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Interv Neuroradiol
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article