Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker.
Vasileiou, Aikaterina; Searle, Dominique; Larsen, Sofus C; Magkos, Faidon; Horgan, Graham; Stubbs, R James; Santos, Inês; Palmeira, António L; Heitmann, Berit L.
Afiliação
  • Vasileiou A; Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: kvasileiou9@gmail.com.
  • Searle D; The Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Larsen SC; The Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Magkos F; Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Horgan G; BioSS, Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Stubbs RJ; School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Santos I; Laboratório de Nutrição, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portu
  • Palmeira AL; CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal; CIFI2D, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Heitmann BL; The Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Boden Group, The Charles Perkin
Nutrition ; 118: 112258, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007995
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss).

METHODS:

Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.

RESULTS:

Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from -91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Monitores de Aptidão Física Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nutrition Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Monitores de Aptidão Física Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nutrition Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article