Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stent Syndrome: Does the Diameter Matter? Results of a Randomized Trial.
Butori, Sofia; Bonanno, Nicolas; Rico, Luis; Contreras, Pablo Nicolas; Pagano, Emanuel Martinez; Blas, Leandro.
Afiliação
  • Butori S; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bonanno N; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Rico L; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Contreras PN; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Pagano EM; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Blas L; Department of Urology, Hospital Aleman of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Endourol ; 38(2): 193-197, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062759
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Double-J (DJ) ureteral stents are used for multiple purposes in urology. Even though they temporize the subsequent treatment of lithiasis, they may cause different symptoms that impact quality of life (QoL).

Purpose:

In this randomized trial, we assessed whether the diameter of ureteral stents has an impact on catheter-associated symptoms, and their impact on QoL.

Methods:

A total of 194 consecutive patients undergoing DJ insertion between December 2018 and December 2022 were prospectively enrolled and divided into three categories 4.7F (Group 1, n = 71), 6F (Group 2, n = 65), and 7F (Group 3, n = 58). Within 1 week after the DJ placement, patients completed the validated Spanish version of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance and Student's t-tests. For categorical data, the chi-square test was used.

Results:

In the domain of "work" and "additional problems," there were significant differences. In the "Work" domain, Group 1 presented the lower symptoms. In the domain "additional problems," patients in Group 1 were prescribed fewer antibiotics owing to low urinary tract symptoms. In question U4 about urinary incontinence, patients in Groups 2 and 3 developed these symptoms more than patients in Group 1. In the "sexual activity" domain, specifically in question S3 (the patient has ever suffered any type of pain during sexual activity?), patients with 4.7F presented lower scores than patients with larger catheters.

Conclusion:

DJ-related symptoms affect QoL in most cases. Smaller catheters produced significantly less urinary incontinence, faster work reincorporation, fewer symptoms related to sexual activity, and fewer catheter-related symptoms than 7F catheters. In contrast, Group 3 presented fewer outpatient visits because of symptoms related to the DJ.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Incontinência Urinária Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Incontinência Urinária Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article