Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrauterine Device Placement Success for Adolescents and Young Adults at Community-Based Reproductive Health Clinics.
Wise, Meredith K; Okuyemi, Oluwatoni; Flint, Maggie; Biscaye, Emily M; Martins, Summer L; Tessier, Katelyn M; Traxler, Sarah A; Boraas, Christy M.
Afiliação
  • Wise MK; University of Minnesota Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: mwise@umn.edu.
  • Okuyemi O; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Flint M; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Biscaye EM; University of Minnesota Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Martins SL; University of Minnesota Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Tessier KM; University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Biostatistics Core, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Traxler SA; Planned Parenthood North Central States, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  • Boraas CM; University of Minnesota Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 37(2): 160-164, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072035
BACKGROUND: Despite the endorsement of intrauterine device (IUD) use in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) by leading professional organizations and demonstrated acceptance and desirability by AYAs, clinicians may worry about the procedural difficulty of IUD device placement in younger patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of first-attempt IUD placement in an AYA population by vaginal delivery (VD) history. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients under 25 years old at reproductive health clinics with an IUD placement attempt between January 1 and August 31, 2017. We abstracted sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy history, and procedural characteristics including complications. Bivariate analyses compared successful first-attempt IUD placement by VD history. We also assessed the frequency of secondary clinical outcomes including ancillary measures used, provider type, symptoms reported during the procedure, and complications. RESULTS: We included 1325 participants (median age = 21.3 years), including 42 (3.2%) with a previous VD. Nearly all IUD placements were successful on the first attempt (n = 1301, 98.2%) and performed by advanced practice clinicians (n = 1314, 99.2%). First-attempt IUD placement success was similar in those participants with and without VD (P > .999). Ancillary measures other than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used infrequently (n = 16, 3.6%). Among participants with an unsuccessful placement, 66.7% returned, and all had a successful IUD placement on the second attempt. Documented complications within 6 months of placement were rare (n = 29) and mostly comprised expulsions (n = 27, 93.1%). CONCLUSION: IUD placement success among AYAs at community-based reproductive health clinics is high and is not associated with a history of VD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Reprodutiva / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Reprodutiva / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article