Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular interventions in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.
Lichtenberg, Michael; Mustapha, Jihad; Tan, Yan Zhi; Stavroulakis, Konstantinos; Meijer, Catherina; Bavière, Henri Vanden.
Afiliação
  • Lichtenberg M; Klinikum Arnsberg GmbH, Karolinen-Hospital, Arnsberg-Hüsten, Germany.
  • Mustapha J; Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
  • Tan YZ; Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Monitor Deloitte, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Stavroulakis K; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany.
  • Meijer C; Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Monitor Deloitte, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Bavière HV; Chief Medical Office - Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vasa ; 53(2): 135-144, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109215
ABSTRACT

Background:

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) might offer clinical benefits compared to angiography-guided PTA in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). A cost-effectiveness model was developed to examine the benefits and costs of IVUS-guided PTA versus angiography-guided PTA in PAD patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease.

Methods:

A two-step model (a one-year decision tree followed by a lifetime semi-Markov model) was developed from a German healthcare payer perspective to estimate the costs and outcomes over a one-year and lifetime horizon. Clinical events included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation, and death. Transition probabilities and utility values were derived from published literature. Healthcare costs were based on German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) codes. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

Results:

In the one-year horizon, IVUS-guided PTA resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs of 0.02 and €919 per patient respectively, with a corresponding ICER of €45,195/QALY gained versus angiography-guided PTA. In the lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PTA outperforms angiography-guided PTA; it was associated with a cost saving of €46 per patient and incremental QALY of 0.22. Utility value for post-TLR, as well as probabilities of death and TLR had the greatest impact on the one-year ICER, while cost of TLR and probabilities of TLR and amputation influenced the lifetime ICER most. The probability of IVUS-guided PTA being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY was 50.4% in the one-year horizon and increased to 85.9% in the lifetime horizon.

Conclusions:

In this analysis IVUS-guided PTA among patients with symptomatic FP atherosclerosis was cost-saving in a lifetime horizon from the German healthcare payer perspective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Análise de Custo-Efetividade Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vasa Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Análise de Custo-Efetividade Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Vasa Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article