Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally invasive ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft for complex ureteral stricture: analysis of surgical and patient-reported outcomes.
Wang, Xiang; Meng, Chang; Li, Derun; Ying, Yicen; Ma, Yunke; Fan, Shubo; Li, Xinfei; Yang, Kunlin; Wang, Bing; Guan, Hua; Zhang, Peng; Liu, Jing; Huang, Chen; Zhu, Hongjian; Zhang, Kai; Zhou, Liqun; Li, Zhihua; Li, Xuesong.
Afiliação
  • Wang X; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Meng C; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Li D; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Ying Y; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Ma Y; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Fan S; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Li X; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Yang K; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Wang B; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Guan H; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Liu J; Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Huang C; Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu H; Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang K; Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou L; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
  • Li X; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(1): 46-57, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166222
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate objective treatment efficacy and safety, and subjective patient-reported outcomes in patients with complex ureteral strictures (US) undergoing minimally invasive lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty (LMGU). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We prospectively enrolled patients underwent robotic or laparoscopic LMGU between May 2020 and July 2022. Clinical success was defined as symptom-free and no radiographic evidence of re-obstruction. Patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health status and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), were longitudinally evaluated before surgery, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS:

Overall, 41 consecutive patients were included. All procedures were performed successfully with 32 patients in robotic approach and 9 in laparoscopic. Forty (97.56%) patients achieved clinical success during the median follow-up of 29 (range 15-41) months. Although patients with complex US experienced poor baseline HRQoL, there was a remarkable improvement following LMGU. Specifically, the 6-month and 12-month postoperative scores were significantly improved compared to the baseline (p < 0.05) in most domains. Twenty-eight (68.3%) and 31 (75.6%) patients had anxiety and depression symptoms before surgery, respectively. However, no significant decrease in the incidence of these symptoms was observed postoperatively. Moreover, there was no significant deterioration of OHRQoL at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively when compared to the baseline.

CONCLUSIONS:

LMGU is a safe and efficient procedure for complex ureteral reconstruction that significantly improves patient-reported HRQoL without compromising OHRQoL. Assessing patients' quality of life enables us to monitor postoperative recovery and progress, which should be considered as one of the criteria for surgical success.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Obstrução Ureteral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Braz J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureter / Obstrução Ureteral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Braz J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article