Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contextualizing the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale in primary healthcare settings: a validity and reliability evaluation study.
Cai, Yiyuan; Guo, Pengfei; Tu, Jiong; Hu, Mengyao; Liu, Lingrui; Ryan, Bridget L; Liao, Jing; Dev, Rubee; Li, Yiran; Huang, Tianyu; Wang, Ruilin; Kuang, Li; Huang, Ruonan; Li, Xinfang; Melipillán, Edmundo Roberto; Zhao, Shuaixiang; He, Wenjun; Wang, Xiaohui; Zhang, Nan; Xu, Dong Roman.
Afiliação
  • Cai Y; Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Hhealth, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China.
  • Guo P; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
  • Tu J; School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Hu M; Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Liu L; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, New Haven, USA.
  • Ryan BL; Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Liao J; Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Dev R; Faculty of Applied ScienceSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Li Y; Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Huang T; School of Sociology and Population Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
  • Wang R; School of Sociology and Population Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
  • Kuang L; Department of Health ManagementSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang R; The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, China.
  • Li X; 13Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Melipillán ER; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad del Desarrollo, Sede Santiago, Chile.
  • Zhao S; Jiaozuo People's Hospital, Jiaozuo, China.
  • He W; Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, School of Health Management and Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Social Medicine and Health ManagementSchool of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zhang N; School of Health Management, Inner Mongolian Medical University, Hohhot, China.
  • Xu DR; Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, School of Health Management and Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. romanxu@i.smu.edu.cn.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 11, 2024 01 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178035
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An English version of the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) scale was recently revised, and it is necessary to test this instrument in different primary care populations.

AIM:

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the PPPC scale.

DESIGN:

A mixed method was used in this study. The Delphi method was used to collect qualitative and quantitative data to address the content validity of the PPPC scale by calculating the Content Validity Index, Content Validity Ratio, the adjusted Kappa, and the Item Impact Score. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to assess the construct validity of the PPPC scale through a cross-sectional survey. The internal consistency was also assessed. SETTING/

PARTICIPANTS:

In the Delphi consultation, seven experts were consulted through a questionnaire sent by email. The cross-sectional survey interviewed 188 outpatients in Guangzhou city and 108 outpatients in Hohhot City from community health service centers or stations face-to-face.

RESULTS:

The 21 items in the scale were relevant to their component. The Item-level Content Validity Index for each item was higher than 0.79, and the average Scale-level content validity index was 0.97 in each evaluation round. The initial proposed 4-factor CFA model did not fit adequately. Still, we found a 3-factor solution based on our EFA model and the validation via the CFA model (model fit [Formula see text], P < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.044, CFI = 0.981; factor loadings 0.553 to 0.888). Cronbach's α also indicated good internal consistency reliability The overall Cronbach's α was 0.922, and the Cronbach's α for each factor was 0.851, 0.872, and 0.717, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Chinese version of the PPPC scale provides a valuable tool for evaluating patient-centered medical service quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Atenção Primária à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção / Atenção Primária à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article