Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeat left ventricular-assisted device exchange and upgrade from second- to third-generation devices in a high-volume single center.
Kassi, Mahwash; Avenatti, Eleonora; Hoang, Khanh-Doan; Zook, Salma; Yousafzai, Rayan; Guha, Ashrith; Bhimaraj, Arvind; Chou, Lin-Chiang Philip; Suarez, Erik E.
Afiliação
  • Kassi M; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Avenatti E; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Hoang KD; Department of Cardiology, University of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas, USA.
  • Zook S; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Yousafzai R; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Guha A; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bhimaraj A; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Chou LP; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Suarez EE; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital - DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Artif Organs ; 48(5): 536-542, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189564
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pump exchange is an established strategy to treat LVAD-related complications such as thrombosis, infection, and driveline failure. Pump upgrades with an exchange to newer generation devices are being performed to the advantage of the patient on long-term support. The safety and efficacy of a repeat LVAD exchange with a concomitant upgrade to a third-generation pump have not been reported.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent a repeat LVAD device exchange and upgrade to HeartMate III (HMIII) at Houston Methodist Hospital between December 2018 and December 2020.

RESULTS:

Five patients underwent exchange and upgrade to HMIII within the specified timeframe. Four patients had already had two prior exchanges (all HMII to HMII), and one patient had one prior exchange (HVAD to HVAD). In all cases, implantation was performed as destination therapy. The surgical exchange was performed via redo median sternotomy on full cardiopulmonary bypass. No unplanned redo surgery of the device component was required. In-hospital mortality was 20% in this very high-risk population. At 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, all discharged patients were on HMIII support, with no major LVAD-related adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION:

We report the feasibility and safety of a repeat pump exchange with an upgrade to HMIII in a high-volume center. The decision for medical therapy versus surgical exchange has to be tailored to individual cases based on risk factors and clinical stability but in expert hands, even a re-redo surgical approach grants options for good medium-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article