Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Acute Schizophrenia.
Sugita, Shutaro; Tomioka, Hiroi; Mera, Kensuke; Tazaki, Taro; Nishiyama, Hana; Yamada, Hiroki; Sanada, Kenji; Inamoto, Atsuko; Iwanami, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Sugita S; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
  • Tomioka H; Mental Care Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, JPN.
  • Mera K; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
  • Tazaki T; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
  • Nishiyama H; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
  • Yamada H; Mental Care Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, JPN.
  • Sanada K; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
  • Inamoto A; Mental Care Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, JPN.
  • Iwanami A; Department of Psychiatry, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52181, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38222994
ABSTRACT
Introduction Schizophrenia symptom severity is linked to neuroinflammation. Certain blood cell indexes such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-albumin ratio (NAR) have been used as biomarkers in various diseases, including schizophrenia. In acute clinical practice, it is challenging to decide whether to provide intravenous antipsychotic treatment in some cases due to the lack of objective biomarkers of psychiatric symptoms. The NLR of individuals with schizophrenia is thought to be associated with disease severity, and changes in NLR may reflect a patient's response to antipsychotic treatment. We investigated the application of NLR as a biomarker for identifying acute severity and determining acute treatment response in patients with schizophrenia. Methods We retrospectively examined 251 inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia and classified them according to treatment (intravenous haloperidol vs. oral antipsychotic medication during the acute phase) and investigated their NLR and NAR while receiving inpatient care. Results A total of 48 inpatients were given intravenous haloperidol to manage their acute symptoms; 208 were given oral antipsychotics. The intravenous haloperidol group experienced more severe symptoms, such as agitation and disorganized thinking, during the acute phase. Further, those who received intravenous haloperidol had significantly higher Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores than the oral antipsychotic group. NLR and NAR were also significantly higher in the haloperidol intravenous group. Conclusion Elevated NLR and NAR could be easily measured in patients with psychomotor agitation who should be treated at any facility. Further, they are useful biomarkers for determining disease severity and the effects of treatment on psychomotor excitement in patients who require intravenous haloperidol.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article