Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu, Olivia; Gomez, Diego E; Obrego, Dasiel; Dunfield, Kari; MacNicol, Jennifer L; Liversidge, Brooklynn; Verbrugghe, Adronie.
Afiliação
  • Chiu O; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Gomez DE; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Obrego D; School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Dunfield K; School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • MacNicol JL; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Liversidge B; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  • Verbrugghe A; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0292731, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285680
ABSTRACT
Canine fecal microbiota profiling provides insight into host health and disease. Standardization of methods for fecal sample storage for microbiomics is currently inconclusive, however. This study investigated the effects of homogenization, the preservative RNAlater, room temperature exposure duration, and short-term storage in the fridge prior to freezing on the canine fecal microbiota profile. Within 15 minutes after voiding, samples were left non-homogenized or homogenized and aliquoted, then kept at room temperature (20-22°C) for 0.5, 4, 8, or 24 hours. Homogenized aliquots then had RNAlater added or not. Following room temperature exposure, all aliquots were stored in the fridge (4°C) for 24 hours prior to storing in the freezer (-20°C), or stored directly in the freezer. DNA extraction, PCR amplification, then sequencing were completed on all samples. Alpha diversity (diversity, evenness, and richness), and beta diversity (community membership and structure), and relative abundances of bacterial genera were compared between treatments. Homogenization and RNAlater minimized changes in the microbial communities over time, although minor changes in relative abundances occurred. Non-homogenized samples had more inter-sample variability and greater changes in beta diversity than homogenized samples. Storage of canine fecal samples in the fridge for 24 h prior to storage in the freezer had little effect on the fecal microbiota profile. Our findings suggest that if immediate analysis of fecal samples is not possible, samples should at least be homogenized to preserve the existing microbiota profile.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiota Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiota Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article