Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in participants aged ≥45 years with stasis dermatitis: Results from a fully decentralized, randomized, proof-of-concept phase 2a study.
Silverberg, Jonathan I; Kirsner, Robert S; Margolis, David J; Tharp, Michael; Myers, Daniela E; Annis, Karen; Graham, Daniela; Zang, Chuanbo; Vlahos, Bonnie L; Sanders, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Silverberg JI; Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. Electronic address: jonathanisilverberg@gmail.com.
  • Kirsner RS; Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Margolis DJ; Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Tharp M; TrueBlue Clinical Research, Tampa, Florida.
  • Myers DE; Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
  • Annis K; Pfizer Inc., New York, New York.
  • Graham D; Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut.
  • Zang C; Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
  • Vlahos BL; Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
  • Sanders P; Pfizer R&D UK Ltd., Tadworth, Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(5): 945-952, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340127
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in stasis dermatitis (SD).

METHODS:

In this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, decentralized phase 2a study (NCT04091087), 65 participants aged ≥45 years with SD without active ulceration received crisaborole or vehicle (11) twice-daily for 6 weeks. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in total sign score at week 6 based on in-person assessment.

RESULTS:

Crisaborole-treated participants had significantly reduced total sign score from baseline versus vehicle based on in-person (nondermatologist) assessment (-32.4% vs -18.1%, P = .0299) and central reader (dermatologists) assessment of photographs (-52.5% vs -10.3%, P = .0004). Efficacy according to success and improvement per Investigator's Global Assessment score and lesional percentage body surface area reached statistical significance based on central reader but not in-person assessments. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders were common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events with crisaborole.

LIMITATIONS:

Small sample size and short treatment duration were key limitations. In-person assessment was not conducted by dermatologists.

CONCLUSION:

Crisaborole improved signs and symptoms of SD and was well tolerated. Central reader assessment represents a promising approach for siteless clinical research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Atópica / Eczema / Dermatoses da Perna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Atópica / Eczema / Dermatoses da Perna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article