Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Batteries or hydrogen or both for grid electricity storage upon full electrification of 145 countries with wind-water-solar?
Jacobson, Mark Z.
Afiliação
  • Jacobson MZ; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA.
iScience ; 27(2): 108988, 2024 Feb 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38352224
ABSTRACT
Grids require electricity storage. Two emerging storage technologies are battery storage (BS) and green hydrogen storage (GHS) (hydrogen produced and compressed with clean-renewable electricity, stored, then returned to electricity with a fuel cell). An important question is whether GHS alone decreases system cost versus BS alone or BS + GHS. Here, energy costs are modeled in 145 countries grouped into 24 regions. Existing conventional hydropower (CH) storage is used along with new BS and/or GHS. A method is developed to treat CH for both baseload and peaking power. In four regions, only CH is needed. In five, CH + BS is the lowest cost. Otherwise, CH + BS + GHS is the lowest cost. CH + GHS is never the lowest cost. A metric helps estimate whether combining GHS with BS reduces cost. In most regions, merging (versus separating) grid and non-grid hydrogen infrastructure reduces cost. In sum, worldwide grid stability may be possible with CH + BS or CH + BS + GHS. Results are subject to uncertainties.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: IScience Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: IScience Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article