Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consistent detection of Trypanosoma brucei but not T. congolense DNA in faeces of experimentally infected cattle.
Saldanha, Isabel; Betson, Martha; Vrettou, Christina; Paxton, Edith; Nixon, James; Tennant, Peter; Ritchie, Adrian; Matthews, Keith R; Morrison, Liam J; Torr, Stephen J; Cunningham, Lucas J.
Afiliação
  • Saldanha I; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. isabel.saldanha@lstmed.ac.uk.
  • Betson M; School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
  • Vrettou C; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Paxton E; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Nixon J; Large Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Tennant P; Large Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Ritchie A; Large Animal Research and Imaging Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Matthews KR; Institute of Immunology and Infection, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Morrison LJ; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Torr SJ; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
  • Cunningham LJ; Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4158, 2024 02 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378867
ABSTRACT
Animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) is a significant food security and economic burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Current AAT empirical and immunodiagnostic surveillance tools suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity, with blood sampling requiring animal restraint and trained personnel. Faecal sampling could increase sampling accessibility, scale, and species range. Therefore, this study assessed feasibility of detecting Trypanosoma DNA in the faeces of experimentally-infected cattle. Holstein-Friesian calves were inoculated with Trypanosoma brucei brucei AnTat 1.1 (n = 5) or T. congolense Savannah IL3000 (n = 6) in separate studies. Faecal and blood samples were collected concurrently over 10 weeks and screened using species-specific PCR and qPCR assays. T. brucei DNA was detected in 85% of post-inoculation (PI) faecal samples (n = 114/134) by qPCR and 50% by PCR between 4 and 66 days PI. However, T. congolense DNA was detected in just 3.4% (n = 5/145) of PI faecal samples by qPCR, and none by PCR. These results confirm the ability to consistently detect T. brucei DNA, but not T. congolense DNA, in infected cattle faeces. This disparity may derive from the differences in Trypanosoma species tissue distribution and/or extravasation. Therefore, whilst faeces are a promising substrate to screen for T. brucei infection, blood sampling is required to detect T. congolense in cattle.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trypanosoma / Trypanosoma brucei brucei / Tripanossomíase Africana / Trypanosoma congolense Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trypanosoma / Trypanosoma brucei brucei / Tripanossomíase Africana / Trypanosoma congolense Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article