Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Minervini, Giuseppe; Marrapodi, Maria Maddalena; Siurkel, Yuliia; Cicciù, Marco; Ronsivalle, Vincenzo.
Afiliação
  • Minervini G; Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Marrapodi MM; Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania, Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, 81100, Italy.
  • Siurkel Y; Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialist Surgery, University of Campania, Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80121, Italy. mariamaddalena.marrapodi@studenti.unicampania.it.
  • Cicciù M; International European University School of Medicine, Akademika Hlushkova Ave, 42В, Kyiv, 03187, Ukraine. yuliasiurkel@ieu.edu.ua.
  • Ronsivalle V; Department of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, Catania, 95123, Italy.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 299, 2024 Mar 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431574
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex joint that facilitates mandibular movements during speech, chewing, and swallowing activities. The Axis I evaluation of the DC/TMD focuses on assessing physical diagnoses related to TMDs. It includes an assessment of pain and functional limitations, such as jaw opening range, joint sounds, and joint tenderness. The Axis II evaluation of the DC/TMD provides information on the patient's psychological status and quality of life. This Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Temporomandibular Disorders diagnosis considered through the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TDM) axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations.

METHODS:

A search was made in PubMed, Web of Science and Lilacs for articles published from the inception until 20 January 2023. We applied the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) model [1] to assess document eligibility. Only studies that evaluated patients by DC/TMD Axis I and Axis II were considered. Review Manager version 5.2.8 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the pooled analysis. We measured the odds ratio (OR) between the two groups (Axis I and Axis II).

RESULTS:

Fifty-one articles were selected because of the search. Four papers were excluded before the screening 2 pieces were not in English, and two were reviewed. The remaining 47 articles were selected for the title and abstract screening to evaluate whether they met the PECO criteria. Among these, four papers were established; the overall effect showed that there was no difference in TMD diagnosis between Axis I and Axis II (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.80- 1.71; Z0.82; P = .41), suggesting that there is no difference between Axis I and Axis II.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, DC/TMD is an effective tool for the diagnosis of TMD. It improves the accuracy of TMD diagnosis, allows for the classification of subtypes, and assesses psychosocial factors that may impact the development or maintenance of TMD symptoms.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Facial / Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Oral Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Facial / Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Oral Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article