Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care: A mixed methods study.
Patel, Ketan; Smith, Daniel J; Huntley, Christopher C; Channa, Sunita D; Pye, Anita; Dickens, Andrew P; Gale, Nicola; Turner, Alice M.
Afiliação
  • Patel K; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Smith DJ; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Huntley CC; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Channa SD; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Pye A; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Dickens AP; Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Midview City, Singapore.
  • Gale N; School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Turner AM; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0298432, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446828
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Within primary care there exists a cohort of patients misdiagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Misdiagnosis can have a detrimental impact on healthcare finances and patient health and so understanding the factors leading to misdiagnosis is crucial in order to reduce misdiagnosis in the future. The objective of this study is to understand and explore the perceived causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.

METHODS:

A sequential mixed methods study, quantifying prevalence and features of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care followed by a qualitative analysis to explore perceived causes of misdiagnosis. Quantitative data was collected for 206 patients identified as misdiagnosed with COPD within the INTEGR COPD study (NCT03482700). Qualitative data collected from 21 healthcare professionals involved in providing COPD care and 8 misdiagnosed patients who were recruited using a maximum variation purposive sampling.

RESULTS:

Misinterpretation of spirometry results was the prevailing factor leading to patients initially being misdiagnosed with COPD, affecting 59% of misdiagnosed patients in this cohort. Of the 99 patients who were investigated for their underlying diagnosis; 41% had normal spirometry and 40% had asthma. Further investigation through qualitative methodology uncovered reluctance to challenge historical misdiagnoses and challenges in differential diagnosis as the underlying explanations for COPD misdiagnosis in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients historically diagnosed with COPD without spirometric evidence are at risk of remaining labelled and treated for COPD despite non-obstructive respiratory physiology, leading to a persistent cohort of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care. The lack of spirometry services during and after the COVID19 pandemic in primary care risks adding to the cohort of misdiagnosed patients. Support from respiratory specialists can potentially help to reduce the prevalence of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03482700.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article