Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adipose perforator flaps without skin donor site: "in between" single scar approach for reconstruction of small peripheral breast defects after lumpectomy.
Bastos, R; Silva, S A.
Afiliação
  • Bastos R; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Avenida Lusíada, 100, 1500-650 Lisboa, and Breast Unit, Hospital de Beatriz Ângelo, Avenida Carlos Teixeira, 3, 2674-514 Loures, Portugal. Electronic address: rfcbastos@gmail.com.
  • Silva SA; Breast Unit and Surgery Department, Hospital de Beatriz Ângelo, Hospital da Luz Torres de Lisboa, Rua Tomás da Fonseca, Edifícios B, D, E F, 1600-209 Lisboa, Portugal.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 91: 363-371, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447506
ABSTRACT
In breast conserving surgery, the reconstruction of defects in small breasts where volume displacement techniques are not feasible can be challenging. In contrast, patients with bigger breasts may not wish to undergo major breast remodeling surgery or breast symmetrization procedures. In such cases, volume replacement techniques can be beneficial, but these leave additional scars and are time consuming. The authors propose an "in between" single scar approach to perform both lumpectomy and reconstruction of small peripheral breast tumors. This approach reduces morbidity and operating time compared with standard volume replacement techniques. The tumors are resected from below, guided by wire, using an incision in the lateral breast crease or inframammary fold, depending on their location. The same incision is used to raise an adipose or adipofascial flap based on perimammary perforators, lateral thoracic artery perforator flap (LTAP), lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP), or anterior intercostal artery perforator flaps (AICAP) flaps, without skin donor site. Between March and November 2022, eight patients underwent this procedure. In four cases LICAP flap was used; in three-AICAP flap was chosen; and in one-LTAP perforator flap was used. Clear surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The average follow-up time was 9.9 months, during which no local recurrences were detected. All flaps survived. Two patients experienced seromas at the donor site, and an organized hematoma was also reported. This approach represents a viable alternative to volume displacement techniques or no reconstruction for small peripheral lumpectomy defects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamoplastia / Retalho Perfurante Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamoplastia / Retalho Perfurante Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article