Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilizing large language models in breast cancer management: systematic review.
Sorin, Vera; Glicksberg, Benjamin S; Artsi, Yaara; Barash, Yiftach; Konen, Eli; Nadkarni, Girish N; Klang, Eyal.
Afiliação
  • Sorin V; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Emek Haela St. 1, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel. verasrn@gmail.com.
  • Glicksberg BS; DeepVision Lab, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. verasrn@gmail.com.
  • Artsi Y; Division of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Barash Y; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.
  • Konen E; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Emek Haela St. 1, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Nadkarni GN; DeepVision Lab, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  • Klang E; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Emek Haela St. 1, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(3): 140, 2024 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504034
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Despite advanced technologies in breast cancer management, challenges remain in efficiently interpreting vast clinical data for patient-specific insights. We reviewed the literature on how large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT might offer solutions in this field.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE for relevant studies published before December 22, 2023. Keywords included "large language models", "LLM", "GPT", "ChatGPT", "OpenAI", and "breast". The risk bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS:

Six studies evaluating either ChatGPT-3.5 or GPT-4, met our inclusion criteria. They explored clinical notes analysis, guideline-based question-answering, and patient management recommendations. Accuracy varied between studies, ranging from 50 to 98%. Higher accuracy was seen in structured tasks like information retrieval. Half of the studies used real patient data, adding practical clinical value. Challenges included inconsistent accuracy, dependency on the way questions are posed (prompt-dependency), and in some cases, missing critical clinical information.

CONCLUSION:

LLMs hold potential in breast cancer care, especially in textual information extraction and guideline-driven clinical question-answering. Yet, their inconsistent accuracy underscores the need for careful validation of these models, and the importance of ongoing supervision.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article