Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale.
Kanakubo, Yusuke; Sugiyama, Yoshifumi; Yoshida, Eriko; Aoki, Takuya; Mutai, Rieko; Matsushima, Masato; Okada, Tadao.
Afiliação
  • Kanakubo Y; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sugiyama Y; Kameda Family Clinic Tateyama, Tateyama, Chiba, Japan.
  • Yoshida E; Nijiiro Doctors, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Aoki T; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Mutai R; Division of Community Health and Primary Care, Center for Medical Education, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Matsushima M; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Okada T; Nijiiro Doctors, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0298574, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536808
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS) is a validated self-assessment tool for health and mental health professionals who provide healthcare for sexual and gender minority patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a Japanese version of LGBT-DOCSS (LGBT-DOCSS-JP) and examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS:

LGBT-DOCSS was translated into Japanese and cross-culturally validated using cognitive debriefing. We then evaluated the structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of LGBT-DOCSS-JP using an online survey.

RESULTS:

Data were analyzed for 381 health and mental health professionals aged 20 years or older from three suburban medical institutions. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original three-factor model did not fit well with LGBT-DOCSS-JP. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four new factors Attitudinal Awareness, Basic Knowledge, Clinical Preparedness, and Clinical Training. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported using four established scales that measured attitudes toward lesbians and gay men, genderism and transphobia, authoritarianism and conventionalism, and social desirability. The internal consistency of LGBT-DOCSS-JP was supported by the Cronbach's alpha values for the overall scale (0.84), and for each of its subscales (Attitudinal Awareness and Basic Knowledge both 0.87, Clinical Preparedness 0.78, and Clinical Training 0.97). The test-retest reliability for the overall LGBT-DOCSS-JP was supported by an intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS:

LGBT-DOCSS-JP has the potential to serve as a valuable tool in the development and assessment of effective curricula for LGBT healthcare education, as well as a means to promote self-reflection among trainees and professionals.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Homossexualidade Feminina / Pessoas Transgênero / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Homossexualidade Feminina / Pessoas Transgênero / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article