Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world overall survival with abiraterone acetate versus enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
George, Daniel J; Ramaswamy, Krishnan; Yang, Hongbo; Liu, Qing; Zhang, Adina; Greatsinger, Alexandra; Ivanova, Jasmina; Thompson, Betty; Emir, Birol; Hong, Agnes; Freedland, Stephen J.
Afiliação
  • George DJ; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA. daniel.george@duke.edu.
  • Ramaswamy K; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Yang H; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Liu Q; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Zhang A; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Greatsinger A; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ivanova J; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Thompson B; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Emir B; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Hong A; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Freedland SJ; Formerly of Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are no large head-to-head phase 3 clinical trials comparing overall survival (OS) for abiraterone and enzalutamide. This study used Medicare claims data to compare OS in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who initiated abiraterone or enzalutamide.

METHODS:

This retrospective analysis of the Medicare database (2009-2020) included adult men with ≥1 claim for prostate cancer, metastatic diagnosis, and no prior chemotherapy or novel hormone therapy who initiated first-line (1L) abiraterone or enzalutamide in the index period (September 10, 2014 to May 31, 2017). Cox proportional-hazards models with inverse probability treatment-weighting (IPTW) were used to compare OS between abiraterone- and enzalutamide-treated patients, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses by baseline characteristics were also conducted.

RESULTS:

Overall, 5506 patients who received 1L abiraterone (n = 2911) or enzalutamide (n = 2595) were included. Median follow-up was comparable in both cohorts (abiraterone, 19.1 months; enzalutamide, 20.3 months). IPTW-adjusted median OS (95% CI) was 20.6 months (19.7‒21.4) for abiraterone and 22.5 months (21.2‒23.8) for enzalutamide, with an IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.10 (1.04-1.16). Median OS was significantly shorter for abiraterone versus enzalutamide in patients ≥75 years old; White patients; patients with baseline diabetes, cardiovascular disease, both diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and renal disease; and across all socioeconomic strata.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the Medicare chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC population, 1L abiraterone was associated with worse OS versus enzalutamide in the overall population and among subgroups with older age and comorbidities, supporting findings from previous real-world studies and demonstrating a disparity in outcomes.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article