Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Updated Analysis of Body Contouring Malpractice Cases.
Reese, Alyssa; Navarro, Alejandro; Kozlowski, Katherine; Singh, Simran; Vu, Giap; Neimanis, Sara; Burke, Mark; Morrison, Clinton.
Afiliação
  • Reese A; From the Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  • Navarro A; Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University, Middletown.
  • Kozlowski K; From the Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  • Singh S; From the Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  • Vu G; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
  • Neimanis S; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
  • Burke M; From the Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo.
  • Morrison C; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S275-S278, 2024 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556689
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Body contouring procedures are commonly performed in the United States for patients seeking to sculpt specific areas of their bodies. The aim of this study was to provide an updated analysis of the factors that influence medical malpractice litigation surrounding body contouring surgery.

METHODS:

The following terms were used to search the Westlaw Campus Legal research Database for cases with earliest documentation after January 2013 ("contouring" OR "abdominoplasty" OR "liposuction" OR "tummy tuck" OR "body lift" OR "thigh lift" OR "arm lift" OR "brachioplasty" OR "thighplasty" OR "lipectomy" OR "panniculectomy") AND "surgery" AND "medical malpractice." Cases were only included if there was a complaint of medical malpractice subsequent to a body contouring procedure, and details of the cases were provided. Information was collected on the location of the lawsuit, the earliest year of available case documentation, patient demographics, procedure(s) performed, alleged injury, specialty involvement, and verdicts.

RESULTS:

A total of 32 cases were included in the study. Most of the patients involved in the cases were women (n = 30, 93.8%) and alive (n = 28, 87.5%). New York state had the most cases (n = 7, 21.9%). Abdominoplasty (56.3%), liposuction (53.1%), and buttock augmentations (15.6%) were the most common procedures. Plastic surgeons were involved in 93.8% (n = 30) of the cases, and anesthesia, emergency medicine, dermatology, and oncology were also involved. Claims of malpractice most often discussed negligent technique (71.9%) and poor postoperative management (62.5%). Common postoperative complications were infection/sepsis (40.6%), scarring (31.3%), and emotional distress/prolonged pain (31.3%). One available ruling was in favor of the plaintiff.

CONCLUSION:

Although many of the cases in this analysis cited negligent technique, none were founded in their argument. Because involvement in these cases can place a burden on attending physicians, clear expectations of postoperative infections, scarring, and prolonged pain should be addressed during the informed consent process.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgiões / Contorno Corporal / Imperícia Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgiões / Contorno Corporal / Imperícia Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article