Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can a clinical assessment predict the functional status progression in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
Frasson, Viviane Bortoluzzi; Vaz, Marco Aurélio; Telöken, Marco Aurélio; Gusmão, Paulo David Fortis; Crestani, Marcus Vinicius; Baroni, Bruno Manfredini.
Afiliação
  • Frasson VB; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Physique - Centro de Fisioterapia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: viviane@physiquefisio.com.br.
  • Vaz MA; Physique - Centro de Fisioterapia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, School of Physical Education, Physical Therapy and Dance, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Telöken MA; Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Gusmão PDF; Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Crestani MV; Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Baroni BM; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 28(2): 101050, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574558
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a hip joint motion-related clinical disorder with a triad of symptoms, clinical signs, and imaging findings. However, scientific evidence is still unclear regarding the best treatment for FAIS.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the value of a physical therapy evaluation in predicting the progression of functional status over the subsequent years in patients with FAIS who are candidates for hip arthroscopy surgery.

METHODS:

In this case-series study, patients with FAIS, candidates for hip arthroscopy surgery, underwent a standard physical therapy evaluation. Baseline data were collected between 2013 and 2019. In 2020/2021, the patients' functional status was assessed through the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Functional status progression was calculated as the difference between the follow-up and baseline iHOT-33 scores. A multivariate forward stepwise regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between baseline characteristics and the functional status progression.

RESULTS:

From 353 patients who completed the baseline assessment, 145 completed the iHOT-33 follow-up. The mean (±SD) follow-up time was 58.7 (27.2) months (minimum 12 and maximum 103 months). The iHOT-33 scores increased 20.7 (21.8) points on average, ranging from -39.8 to 76.9 points. Among the 15 potential predictive factors assessed in this study, only baseline iHOT-33 score (ß -0.44; -0.061, -0.27), femoral version (ß 9.03; 1.36, 16.71), and body mass index (ß -0.99; -1.98, -0.01) had the ability to predict the functional status progression.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with a lower baseline iHOT-33 score, lower body mass index, and normal femoral version were more likely to increase their functional status after a minimum of one year of follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Impacto Femoroacetabular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Impacto Femoroacetabular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article