Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the Role of AI in Predicting the Success of Dental Implants Based on Preoperative CBCT Images: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rajan, R S Senthil; Kumar, H S Kiran; Sekhar, Anand; Nadakkavukaran, Davis; Feroz, Shaikh M A; Gangadharappa, Praveen.
Afiliação
  • Rajan RSS; Department of Periodontology, Rajarajeswari Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
  • Kumar HSK; Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, Hassan, Karnataka, India.
  • Sekhar A; Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
  • Nadakkavukaran D; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sree Anjaneya Institute of Dental Sciences, Modakkallur, Kerala, India.
  • Feroz SMA; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
  • Gangadharappa P; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Jazan University- College of Dentistry, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 16(Suppl 1): S886-S888, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595393
ABSTRACT

Background:

Dental implant surgery has become a widely accepted method for replacing missing teeth. However, the success of dental implant procedures can be influenced by various factors, including the quality of preoperative planning and assessment. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging provides valuable insights into a patient's oral anatomy, but accurately predicting implant success remains a challenge. Materials and

Methods:

In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), a cohort of 150 patients requiring dental implants was randomly divided into two groups an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted group and a traditional assessment group. Preoperative CBCT images of all patients were acquired and processed. The AI-assisted group utilized a machine learning model trained on historical data to assess implant success probability based on CBCT images, while the traditional assessment group relied on conventional methods and clinician expertise. Key parameters such as bone density, bone quality, and anatomical features were considered in the AI model.

Results:

After the completion of the study, the AI-assisted group demonstrated a significantly higher implant success rate, with 92% of implants successfully integrating into the bone compared to 78% in the traditional assessment group. The AI model showed an accuracy of 87% in predicting implant success, whereas traditional assessment methods achieved an accuracy of 71%. Additionally, the AI-assisted group had a lower rate of complications and required fewer postoperative interventions compared to the traditional assessment group.

Conclusion:

The AI-assisted approach significantly improved implant success rates and reduced complications, underscoring the importance of incorporating AI into the dental implant planning process.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article