Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors associated with false negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fan, Meng-Si; Qiu, Ke-Xin; Wang, Dong-Yue; Wang, Hao; Zhang, Wei-Wei; Yan, Li.
Afiliação
  • Fan MS; Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
  • Qiu KX; Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
  • Wang DY; School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
  • Wang H; School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
  • Zhang WW; Department of Gynecology, Tengzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Tengzhou, Shandong, China.
  • Yan L; Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1391267, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634055
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Currently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is increasingly used in endometrial cancer, but the rate of missed metastatic lymph nodes compared to systemic lymph node dissection has been a concern. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB in patients with endometrial cancer and to explore the risk factors associated with this FNR. Data sources Three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were searched from initial database build to January 2023 by two independent reviewers. Research eligibility criteria Studies were included if they included 10 or more women diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I or higher endometrial cancer, the study technique used sentinel lymph node localization biopsy, and the reported outcome metrics included false negative and/or FNR. Study appraisal and synthesis

methods:

Two authors independently reviewed the abstracts and full articles. The FNR and factors associated with FNR were synthesized through random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression. The

results:

We identified 62 eligible studies. The overall FNR for the 62 articles was 4% (95% CL 3-5).There was no significant difference in the FNR in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer compared to patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. There was no difference in the FNR for whether frozen sections were used intraoperatively. The type of dye used intraoperatively (indocyanine green/blue dye) were not significantly associated with the false negative rate. Cervical injection reduced the FNR compared with alternative injection techniques. Indocyanine green reduced the FNR compared with alternative Tc-99m. Postoperative pathologic ultrastaging reduced the FNR.

Conclusions:

Alternative injection techniques (other than the cervix), Tc-99m dye tracer, and the absence of postoperative pathologic ultrastaging are risk factors for a high FNR in endometrial cancer patients who undergo SLNB; therefore, we should be vigilant for missed diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes after SLNB in such populations. Systematic review registration http//www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023433637.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article