Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.
Kim, Dong Jun; Yoon, Nan-He; Jun, Jae Kwan; Suh, Mina; Lee, Sunhwa; Kim, Seongju; Kim, Ji Eun; Lee, Hooyeon.
Afiliação
  • Kim DJ; Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yoon NH; Department of Public Health, Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jun JK; Division of Social Welfare and Health Administration, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
  • Suh M; National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee S; Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Kim S; National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Kim JE; Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee H; National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat ; 2024 Apr 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38637965
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The rate of interval colorectal cancer (iCRC) is now accepted as a key performance indicator of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We aimed to examine the association between endoscopist volumes and the rate of iCRC among individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within a nationwide population-based CRC screening program. Materials and

Methods:

Individuals aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy after a positive FIT from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2020 in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) were enrolled. We converted the data into per-endoscopist screening results, calculated the iCRC rates per endoscopist, and compared them to the previous year's annual volume that was divided into five groups (V1, 1-9; V2, 10-29; V3, 30-59; V4, 60-119; V5, ≥120).

Results:

A total of 10,412 endoscopists performed 216,907 colonoscopies. Overall, the average rate of iCRC per endoscopist was 8.46 per 1,000 examinations. Compared with the group with the highest volume (V5 group), the rate of iCRC was 2.21 times higher in the V1 group. Similar trends were observed in the other groups (V2 Relative risks [RR], 2.15; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.57-2.94; V3 RR, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.15-2.13; V4 RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83-1.67).

Conclusion:

The findings emphasize that endoscopists with lower procedure volumes have higher risks of interval cancer being missed or undetected. To maximize the preventative impact of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer, this issue should be addressed by monitoring endoscopist volumes and variations in performances.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article