Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modification of Dialysate Na+ Concentration but not Ultrafiltration or Dialysis Treatment Time Affects Tissue Na+ Deposition in Patients on Hemodialysis.
Kopp, Christoph; Kittler, Lukas; Linz, Peter; Kannenkeril, Dennis; Horn, Stephan; Chazot, Charles; Schiffer, Mario; Uder, Michael; Nagel, Armin M; Dahlmann, Anke.
Afiliação
  • Kopp C; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kittler L; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Linz P; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kannenkeril D; Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Horn S; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Chazot C; Kuratorium für Heimdialyse, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schiffer M; Clinique Charcot, Sainte Foy Les Lyon, France.
  • Uder M; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Nagel AM; Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Dahlmann A; Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Kidney Int Rep ; 9(5): 1310-1320, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707813
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Tissue Na+ overload is present in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with cardiovascular mortality. Strategies to actively modify tissue Na+ amount in these patients by adjusting the HD regimen have not been evaluated.

Methods:

In several substudies, including cross-sectional analyses (n = 75 patients on HD), a cohort study and a cross-over interventional study (n = 10 patients each), we assessed the impact of ultrafiltration (UF) volume, prolongation of dialysis treatment time, and modification of dialysate Na+ concentration on tissue Na+ content using 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI).

Results:

In the cross-sectional analysis of our patients on HD, differences in dialysate sodium concentration ([Na+]) were associated with changes in tissue Na+ content, whereas neither UF volume nor HD treatment time affected tissue Na+ amount. Skin Na+ content was lower in 17 patients on HD, with dialysate [Na+] of <138 mmol/l compared to 58 patients dialyzing at ≥138 mmol/l (20.7 ± 7.3 vs. 26.0 ± 8.8 arbitrary units [a.u.], P < 0.05). In the cohort study, intraindividual prolongation of HD treatment time was not associated with a reduction in tissue Na+ content. Corresponding to the observational data, intraindividual modification of dialysate [Na+] from 138 to 142 to 135 mmol/l resulted in concordant changes in skin Na+ (24.3 ± 7.6 vs. 26.3 ± 8.0 vs. 20.8 ± 5.6 a.u, P < 0.05 each), whereas no significant change in muscle Na+ occurred.

Conclusion:

Solely adjustment of dialysate [Na+] had a reproducible impact on tissue Na+ content. 23Na-MRI could be utilized to monitor the effectiveness of dialysate [Na+] modifications in randomized-controlled outcome trials.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article