Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical value of retinol binding protein, C-reactive protein and urine microalbumin in patients with chronic renal disease and ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Wu, Huiwen; Li, Luoping.
Afiliação
  • Wu H; Department of Internal Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Tonglu County Hangzhou 311500, Zhejiang, China.
  • Li L; Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Tonglu County Hangzhou 311500, Zhejiang, China.
Am J Transl Res ; 16(4): 1415-1423, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715821
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the diagnostic value of retinol binding protein (RBP), C-reactive protein (CRP) and urine microalbumin (UMA) for ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS:

In this study, a total of 118 patients with CKD were selected and grouped into two groups a group of patients who were complicated with ICD (CKD+ICD group, n=58), and a group of patients with CKD only (CKD group, n=60). Then, the patients in the CKD+ICD group were further classified into a good prognosis group and a bad prognosis group according their modified Rankin scale score at sixth months after discharge. Serum RBP, CRP and urine UMA levels were compared between the CKD group and CKD+ICD group. The diagnostic efficiency of serum RBP, CRP and urine UMA levels for ICD in patients with CKD was analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess their prognostic performance. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for poor prognosis of patients with CKD and ICD.

RESULTS:

The levels of RBP, CRP, and UMA in the CKD+ICD group were significantly higher than those in the CKD group (all P<0.05). RBP demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for ICD in CKD patients, while CRP and UMA exhibited equivalent specificity, surpassing that of RBP. ROC curves showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) of RBP and CRP were significantly greater than that of UMA (P<0.05) and there was no significant difference for AUCs between RBP and CRP. In addition, the levels of RBP, CRP and UMA in the poor prognosis group were significantly higher than those in the good prognosis group (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that RBP, CRP and UMA were independent risk factors for the poor prognosis of patients with CKD and ICD (Odds ratios =2.507, 3.677 and 1.919, respectively; all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The assessment of RBP, CRP and UMA is recommended for diagnosis of ICD in CKD patients. RBP, CRP and UMA are independent risk factors for poor prognosis of CKD patients with ICD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transl Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transl Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article