Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individualizing Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Modular Imaging Algorithm.
Hofmann, Amun Georg; Mlekusch, Irene; Wickenhauser, Georg; Walter, Corinna; Taher, Fadi; Assadian, Afshin.
Afiliação
  • Hofmann AG; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
  • Mlekusch I; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
  • Wickenhauser G; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
  • Walter C; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
  • Taher F; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
  • Assadian A; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(9)2024 Apr 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732344
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Surveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) is mainly directed by one-size-fits-all approaches instead of personalized decision making, even though treatment strategies and often endografts themselves are tailor-made to adjust for individual patients. We propose a modular imaging algorithm that escalates surveillance imaging based on invasiveness and need. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this retrospective observational study of single-center data, results of a modular imaging algorithm were analyzed. The algorithm is characterized by initiating the examination with standard B-mode then transitioning to Duplex ultrasound, B-Flow, and CEUS. Additional CT(A) studies are conducted where required. The study population included both patients receiving EVAR or FEVAR. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding endoleak detection.

RESULTS:

The study population included 28 patients receiving EVAR and 40 patients receiving FEVAR. They accounted for 101 follow-up visits, which led to 431 distinct imaging studies. CEUS has the highest endoleak detection rate, followed by CTA and B-Flow. Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow resulted in 0 and 1 false positive cases, respectively, considering CEUS the reference standard. In a select group of six patients, CEUS was omitted after endoleaks were displayed by Duplex ultrasound or B-Flow, leading to a successful type II coiling and no aneurysm-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

The proposed modular algorithm showed great potential to incorporate principles of personalized medicine in surveillance after endovascular aortic treatment. Since Duplex ultrasound and B-Flow rarely cause false positive endoleaks, more resource-intensive and invasive imaging studies such as CEUS and CTA can be omitted after positive identification.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article