Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What was first and what is next in selecting device-aided therapy in Parkinson's disease? Balancing evidence and experience.
Phokaewvarangkul, Onanong; Auffret, Manon; Groppa, Sergiu; Markovic, Vladana; Petrovic, Igor; Bhidayasiri, Roongroj.
Afiliação
  • Phokaewvarangkul O; Chulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Auffret M; France Développement Electronique (FDE), Monswiller, France, Institut Des Neurosciences Cliniques de Rennes (INCR), Rennes, France, Behavior and Basal Ganglia Research Unit, CIC-IT, CIC1414, Pontchaillou University Hospital and University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Groppa S; Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Markovic V; Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Petrovic I; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Bhidayasiri R; Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747986
ABSTRACT
Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses with motor fluctuations emerging several years after treatment initiation. Initially managed with oral medications, these fluctuations may later necessitate device-aided therapy (DATs). Globally, various DATs options are available, including continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion, deep brain stimulation, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel, and subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion, each with its complexities. Hence, matching complex patients with suitable therapy is critical. This review offers practical insights for physicians managing complex PD cases. Balancing evidence and experience is vital to select the most suitable DATs, considering factors like disease stage and patient preferences. Comparative analysis of DATs benefits and risks provides essential insights for clinicians and patients. Treatment sequences vary based on availability, patient needs, and disease progression. Less invasive options like apomorphine are often preferred initially, followed by other DATs if needed. Patient selection requires comprehensive evaluations, including motor function and cognitive status. Follow-up care involves symptom monitoring and adjusting medications. Customized treatment plans are essential for optimizing PD management with DATs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article