Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which is the best TACE agent for patients with different NLR hepatocellular carcinomas? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang, Shuai; Geng, Hefeng; Li, Yizhen; Xu, Ziang; Yang, Kaisi; Yang, Ling; Hui, Fuhai; Zhang, Yingshi.
Afiliação
  • Wang S; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Geng H; Bei Fang Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, No. 103, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Li Y; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Xu Z; Bei Fang Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, No. 103, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Yang K; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Yang L; Bei Fang Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, No. 103, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Hui F; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016 China.
  • Zhang Y; Bei Fang Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, No. 103, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, 110016 China.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e30759, 2024 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38765170
ABSTRACT

Background:

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a common treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the best therapeutic agent for TACE treatment has not been determined. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a systemic immune system marker; however, the ability of the NLR to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC is unknown, and no studies have been conducted to determine the most appropriate TACE regimen for HCC patients with different NLRs.

Methods:

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched through May 28, 2023. Comparisons of overall survival (OS) among cohort studies with different NLRs and different TACE treatment regimens were performed with a random effects model.

Findings:

Thirty-five studies involving 9210 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that Group 3-4 (NLR<2.5) patients had a significantly longer OS than Group 1-2 (NLR 2.5-5.0). Among the patients, Group 1-3 (NLR 2.0-5.0) patients had the best survival after treatment with adriamycin (lnHR (95 % CI = 0.48 [0.31, 0.75] and lnHR (95 % CI = 0.41 [0.19, 0.91]). Among the Group 4 patients (NLR<2.0), the best outcome was obtained with platinum + adriamycin (lnHR (95 % CI = 0.59 [0.45, 0.78]), followed by adriamycin. A subgroup analysis of TACE combined with other treatments showed that adriamycin combined with sorafenib was the most effective and superior to the other treatment agents.

Interpretation:

The NLR can be used to predict the prognosis of HCC patients treated with TACE; the higher the NLR is, the worse the prognosis. Adriamycin may be the best therapeutic agent for HCC patients treated with TACE.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article