Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shared Decision-making in Breast Cancer Reconstructive Surgery: Experience in a Leading Hospital.
Herrera de la Muela, María; Sanz Medrano, Santiago; Leyva, Francisco; Masa Jurado, Inmaculada; Membrilla Ortiz, Ana I; Brenes Sánchez, Juana; de la Puente Yagüe, Miriam; Ruiz Rodríguez, Jorge; Buendía Pérez, Javier.
Afiliação
  • Herrera de la Muela M; From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanz Medrano S; Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Leyva F; Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Masa Jurado I; Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Membrilla Ortiz AI; From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Brenes Sánchez J; From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • de la Puente Yagüe M; From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ruiz Rodríguez J; From the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Buendía Pérez J; Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(5): e5846, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784835
ABSTRACT

Background:

The paradigm of healthcare has evolved toward patient-centered approaches, where shared decision-making (SDM) plays a pivotal role. This study aimed to explore the implementation of SDM during breast cancer reconstruction consultations and assess its impact on patient satisfaction and the decision-making process as a whole.

Methods:

A total of 102 female patients undergoing breast reconstruction were included in a multidisciplinary breast pathology unit. A streamlined SDM model involving choice introduction, option description, and preference exploration was implemented. A validated Spanish version of the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire was used alongside a complementary questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using electronic data capture software.

Results:

The nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire results indicate strong agreement in presenting various options and explaining their advantages and disadvantages. Patients were less confident about their participation in decision-making. The Complementary Shared Decision Making Questionnaire highlighted high satisfaction with interview times and language clarity but areas for improvement in consultation space and therapeutic choice participation.

Conclusions:

Integrating SDM into breast reconstruction consultations empowers patients in the decision-making process and enhances satisfaction. Decision aids prove effective in this context, facilitating patients' comprehension and reducing decisional conflict. There are areas for improvement within the SDM strategy, and they are detectable through scales. Although challenges in information transmission and patient involvement persist, adopting an SDM model has potential benefits that warrant further investigation.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article