Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Predictors of Early Treatment Effectiveness of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Application in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.
Katic, Karla; Katic, Josip; Kumric, Marko; Bozic, Josko; Tandara, Leida; Supe Domic, Daniela; Bucan, Kajo.
Afiliação
  • Katic K; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Katic J; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Kumric M; Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Bozic J; Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Tandara L; Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Supe Domic D; Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Bucan K; Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(10)2024 May 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38786290
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to establish whether multiple blood parameters might predict an early treatment response to intravitreal bevacizumab injections in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Seventy-eight patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DME were included. The treatment response was evaluated with central macular thickness decrease and best corrected visual acuity increase one month after the last bevacizumab injection. Parameters of interest were the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), vitamin D, and apolipoprotein B to A-I ratio (ApoB/ApoA-I). The NLR (2.03 ± 0.70 vs. 2.80 ± 1.08; p < 0.001), MLR (0.23 ± 0.06 vs. 0.28 ± 0.10; p = 0.011), PLR (107.4 ± 37.3 vs. 135.8 ± 58.0; p = 0.013), and SII (445.3 ± 166.3 vs. 675.3 ± 334.0; p < 0.001) were significantly different between responder and non-responder groups. Receiver operator characteristics analysis showed the NLR (AUC 0.778; 95% CI 0.669-0.864), PLR (AUC 0.628; 95% CI 0.511-0.735), MLR (AUC 0.653; 95% CI 0.536-0.757), and SII (AUC 0.709; 95% CI 0.595-0.806) could be predictors of response to bevacizumab in patients with DME and NPDR. Patients with severe NPDR had a significantly higher ApoB/ApoA-I ratio (0.70 (0.57-0.87) vs. 0.61 (0.49-0.72), p = 0.049) and lower vitamin D (52.45 (43.10-70.60) ng/mL vs. 40.05 (25.95-55.30) ng/mL, p = 0.025). Alterations in the NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII seem to provide prognostic information regarding the response to bevacizumab in patients with DME, whilst vitamin D deficiency and the ApoB/ApoA-I ratio could contribute to better staging.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article