Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical significance and prognostic value of right bundle branch block in permanent pacemaker patients.
Mazza, Andrea; Bendini, Maria Grazia; Leggio, Massimo; Imberti, Jacopo F; Valsecchi, Sergio; Boriani, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Mazza A; Cardiology Division, S. Maria della Stella Hospital, Orvieto.
  • Bendini MG; Cardiology Division, S. Maria della Stella Hospital, Orvieto.
  • Leggio M; Clinica Salus Infirmorum, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome.
  • Imberti JF; Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena.
  • Valsecchi S; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.
  • Boriani G; Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 25(7): 551-558, 2024 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809231
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with no prior history of heart failure (HF), the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been identified as an independent predictor of HF-related death or hospitalization, while the prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the long-term risk of all-cause mortality in patients with a standard indication for permanent pacing and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function when RBBB is detected at the time of implantation.

METHODS:

We retrospectively enrolled 1348 consecutive patients who had undergone single- or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at the study center, from January 1990 to December 2022. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or a prior diagnosis of HF were excluded.

RESULTS:

The baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed an RBBB in 241 (18%) and an LBBB in 98 (7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 65 [25th-75th percentile 32-117] months, 704 (52%) patients died. The combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was reached by 173 (13%) patients. On multivariate analysis, RBBB was confirmed as an independent predictor of death [hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.63; P  = 0.005]. However, when considering the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization, this endpoint was independently associated with LBBB (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.38-3.29; P  < 0.001), but not with RBBB.

CONCLUSION:

In patients with standard pacemaker indications and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function, the presence of basal RBBB was an independent predictor of mortality. However, it was not associated with the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Bloqueio de Ramo / Eletrocardiografia Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Bloqueio de Ramo / Eletrocardiografia Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article