Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reasons for Revision Surgery after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty based on Medical Device Reports Maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Altorfer, Franziska C S; Kelly, Michael J; Avrumova, Fedan; Zhu, Jiaqi; Abjornson, Celeste; Lebl, Darren R.
Afiliação
  • Altorfer FCS; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery,523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
  • Kelly MJ; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery,523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
  • Avrumova F; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery,523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
  • Zhu J; Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, 523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
  • Abjornson C; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery,523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lebl DR; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery,523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819199
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective Database review.

OBJECTIVE:

Analyze revisions of CDAs reported to the MAUDE database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical disease, demonstrating comparable outcomes. Despite the availability of variable CDA designs, there is limited data on the specific complications of individual CDAs. The Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database has been used to systematically report complications associated with CDAs. However, data on specific reasons for CDA revision remains scarce. The purpose of this study is to compare common complications associated with revision for different CDAs.

METHODS:

The MAUDE database was queried from January 2005 to September 2023, including all nine FDA-approved CDAs. The full-text reports of each complication were categorized based on whether revision surgery was performed, the complications and the type of CDA collected and compared.

RESULTS:

A total of 678 revisions for nine CDAs were reported Mobi-C (239), M6 (167), Prodisc-C (88), Prestige (60), PCM (44), Bryan (35), Secure (23), Simplify (21), and Discover (1). The top three complications associated with revision were migration (23.5%), neck pain (15.5%), and heterotopic ossification (6.6%). The most common complications per device were migration for Mobi-C (26.4%), Prodisc-C (21.3%), Prestige (24.6%), PCM (84.1%), Bryan (48.6%), Secure (30.4%), and Discover (100%). For M6, the most common complications associated with revision surgery were osteolysis (18.6%) and neck pain (18.6%), while neck pain (23.8%) was the most common for the Simplify.

CONCLUSION:

The MAUDE database highlights complications related to CDA revision in which the primary complications consistently include implant migration, neck pain, and heterotopic ossification ,varying in their rerelvance depending on the CDA.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article